(YAMAMOTO
Yoichi, PPPC Visiting Researcher)
Many
people should be sick of scandals by local assemblyman. There are many reports
on deplorable affairs of local assemblyman every single day such as slurs,
emotional outburst, use of quasi-legal narcotic, and others. Although being indifferent
myself, the author found an astonishing news.
An
article of Chunichi Shimbun on July 24 titled “improper remark, spearhead turns
to accuser assemblyman” is a subsequent report of the news saying that a city
councilor of Shinshiro city, Aichi prefecture, stated “(why not) distribute punched
condoms?” in the hall. The news reported that the assembly held a meeting on
July 23 to discuss measures.
Normally,
we would expect it ends with an apology of the councilor concerned; however,
Shinshiro city did not. The assembly regarded another councilor who criticized
the gaffe in his blog as the main culprit, and drafted a new rule to restrict
assemblyman’s information releases.
The
concerned gaffe is stated by a nonpartisan assemblyman Tomonaga Osada in June
as a proposition “how about distributing punched condoms to couples who
submitted registration of marriage (as countermeasure to aging)?” Although it
didn’t attract much attention in the beginning, it was made public by a blog post
by Yohei Asao, Japan Communist Party, on July 14 which was followed by media
reports taking the gaffe as part of scandals by local assemblyman. Even though
it was a public remark in the official meeting of assembly, citizens wouldn’t
have noticed only if Asao did not mention it in his blog.
Nonetheless,
in the meeting on July 23, certain assemblyman voiced doubts on “releasing
personal view before stating it in the assembly” and “certain considerations
should have been given, e.g., noticing the other side, if releasing it with
individual names.” Other members followed, and agreed to establish new rules on
releasing opinions in the twitter or blog.
However,
what’s wrong with an assemblyman, not mayor, who releases personal opinions? It
is an important duty of the assemblyman to reflect voices of the residents on
questions and to release personal views in front of the assembly. Also it is a
strange idea to notice in advance the elected, subject assemblyman. If such an
idea is reasonable, any party headquarters or Cabinet Office would be chaotically
busy.
In
the first place, the concerned remark does deserve criticisms. If Osada really
thinks it is an effective idea to distribute punched condoms as countermeasure
to depopulating society, obviously he is not as talented as being an elected
official. Perhaps he might have said it as a light joke in the official session
of the assembly, but it would also mean he lacks seriousness and manner as an assemblyman.
The
assembly must face the issue seriously, if not resignation by Osada, instead of
sidestepping the criticisms and accusing the councilor who revealed the gaffe. Further,
it must not move against the stream of seeking transparency of the assembly.
According
to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the number of local
assembly members in the country amounts to up to 34,476. There will likely be
increasing voices as “we don’t need that many.” The local assemblies face the
challenge of reducing the seats drastically, or proving their own significance
of being by truly working for the sake of citizens.