Public Policy Planning & Consulting Co. (SEISAKU-KOUBOU) is a public policy consulting firm based in Tokyo, covering broad policy areas such as economic policy, fiscal policy, regulatory policy, administrative reform, international trade and investment, etc.
PPPC provides consulting and briefing services to the clients in the central/local governments, Diet, local assemblies and the private sector.

This blog is aimed at providing general information, latest updates and some of our analytical reports about Japan's public policy in English.
The contents include;
- updates on some important government councils, especially those in which our executive officers serve as the members,
- weekly reports on latest news in Nagata-cho, the political center in Japan, (partially).
- analytical reports and articles by our members and distinguished experts outside the firm,(partially).

10.10.2013

Special Zones for Employment Deregulation

* Written by Eiji HARA, PPPC President


 There was a media report phrasing “Special Zones to make it easy to
fire the employees.” While the article stressed the possibility as
that “you’re fired because you’re late” depending on the clauses
of employment contracts, such an understanding is not accurate. 

 It is not that the clauses of the employment contract will be
respected than any others no matter how inappropriate they are; the
contents are to be checked according to a basic guideline.

 Also, such the employment contracts are to be limitedly applied
according to the three perspectives of location, company and employees.
It reflects the idea that the subject of this policy suggestion is
limited to high-class employees in the global companies.

 This suggestion, to be shown below, is just a moderate one, and if 
the government is incapable of handling this, we cannot stop being
pessimistic about the future of employment/labor reforms.


====================
National Strategic Special Zones 
-- Suggestion on Employment Policy by the Working Group


1.Outline: Making an easy environment
・For global and start-up companies to draw able human resources and
・For able employees to work in such companies

(currently, it is restricted by the employment regulation if a company
wanted to employ some experts for a few year’s projects by terminable
contracts.)

・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・

⇒This continuance by PPPC Briefing Service

 PPPC’s weekly updates and articles are fully accessible to the
 subscribed customers.

10.06.2013

Abe Okays “Course of Action of the Growth Strategy” (October 1)

The Cabinet held a meeting of the headquarter for Japan’s economic recovery and officially approved the “course of action of the growth strategy” to promote and accelerate the “third arrow” of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s economic policy dubbed “Abenomics” on Oct 1.


(1)    Points in the “course of action for the growth strategy”

Abe had directed his Cabinet ministers to finalize the “course of action” of the growth strategy on Sept 2 prior to the next extraordinary Diet session scheduled on Oct 15. The government’s Industrial Competitiveness Council held intensive discussions and drafted a “course of action (tentative)”, and the Cabinet this time approved the course of action according to the document.

It entails
l  Institutional foundation for regulatory and institutional reform: National Strategic Special Zones
l  Promotion of private investment and industrial renewal: tax reform to promote investment in productivity and industrial reshuffle, promotion of monetary and capital market, etc.
l  Labor/employment policy reform, college/university reform to enhance human resource capability
l  Establishment of new markets as Japan’s growth engine via regulatory reform and market opining: Organization for Farmland Interim Management to mediate leasing of abandoned farmland, medical-care market reform, power industry reform, etc.
l  Promotion/innovation of local economy and small- and middle-size corporations: meeting for local industrial competitiveness as local version of Industrial Competitiveness Council, promotion of new incorporation through partnership between municipal governments and private, etc.

*“Course of Action of the Growth Strategy” (Japanese only)


To tackle with these challenges, the Cabinet plans to submit the following bills in the next Diet session and seeks early passages of them.

²  Bill to boost Industrial Competitiveness
²  Bill on National Strategic Special Zones
²  Bill on revision of the Company Act
²  Bill on revision of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act
²  Bill to secure safety of the Regenerative Medicine
²  Bill on Power Industry Reform
²  Bill to establish an Organization for Farmland Interim Management (tentative) and bill on agricultural/forestry/fishery renewable energy



(2)    National Strategic Special Zones

Amongst them, the particular content (outline) of the National Strategic Special Zones, regarded as a breakthrough toward the country’s “bedrock” regulations, is as follows.

I.          Accelerate the structural reforms by threefold strategy of “strategic regional” “corporate” and “national” levels.

①       Strategic regional level: to promote drastic regulatory/institutional reforms in the fields of medical care, agriculture, education, city planning, etc., in the designated National Strategic Special Zones

Items of regulatory reforms
Ø  Relooking of land-use regulations such as floor-area-ratio restriction and purposes
Ø  Admission of public schools to be managed by private organizations
Ø  Establishment of international medical center, relaxation of its bed-number regulation
Ø  Expansion of medical treatment not covered by the public medical insurance
Ø  Exceptional measures on use of buildings for accommodations
Ø  Institutional design to boost the agricultural competitiveness
Ø  Etc.

②       Corporate level: “exceptional measures on corporate evidence” to promote new industrial frontiers by admitting exceptions to the existing regulations

③       National level:
Ø  Establishment of a “gray-zone annulment” system which explicitly defines application of the regulations to ease entries into new industries
Ø  Further promotion and acceleration of the national-level regulatory reforms by partnership of the Industrial Competitiveness Council and the Regulatory Reform Council, especially in the field of employment, medical care, agriculture, etc.


Prime Minister Abe stated in the Industrial Competitive Council that the regulatory reform will be the breakthrough to boost the country’s economic growth and stressed to promote reforms in the fields of labor and medical care.

Yet, for the persistent resistance of the Ministry of Health and Labor and the labor unions behind in favor of the existing labor legislations and against relaxation of the employment protection in particular, the “Course of Action” failed to entail specific legislative measures regarding the labor and employment.

And some members of the Industrial Competitiveness Council, insisting liquidation and mobilization of workforce and diversification of labor, have given critical comments to the passive attitude of the Ministry of Health and Labor (“Though there were certain advancements in many bedrock regulations, it is unfortunate that there was no progress in the field of ‘employment’.”: paper presented by Heizo Takenaka in the Industrial Competitiveness Council on Oct 1).

Akira Amari, the minister in-charge-of economic recovery, showed his view on Oct 1 that “it is needed to let employment have certain flexibility” and stressed he will continue the efforts toward relaxation of employment regulations, including the Special Zones.

How much initiative and leadership will Abe and Amari take over the content and extent of deregulation in the rigid fields such as medical care or employment? It is a big test to Abe and his Cabinet’s decisiveness toward regulatory reforms.


(Yoshiyuki KUROSAWA, PPPC Chief Researcher)

10.03.2013

Transition in Inspection Policy toward Banks

* Written by PPPC Visiting Fellow


 TBS’s drama “Naoki Hanzawa” had an audience rating of 42.2% in its
final play on September 22. One of the central themes in the drama was
the battle between the banks and the financial authority over the
inspections.

 When the bad loans of the banks were so serious in this country,
every financial institution was afraid of the inspections by the
Financial Services Agency.

 After the collapse of Japan’s bubble economy, due to the increasing
criticisms against the Ministry of Finance for treating too leniently
the financial institutions caused to have a huge amount of
nonperforming debts, the governmental branches in charge of checking
and supervising the financial institutions were separated from the MoF
and the new Financial Services Agency was established.

 The main feature of the Agency was that the Inspection Bureau, in
charge of on-the-spot inspections, was designed as a highly autonomous
branch separated from the Supervisory Bureau engaging in day-to-day
investigations in order to prevent on-the-spot judgments from being
discarded by the supervisory branch finally responsible for improving
the performances of the banks; an internationally-unique institutional
feature.

 For such a historical background, the Inspection Bureau carries a
heavier weight in the Financial Services Agency and its Commissioner’
s post has been dominated by the ex-inspection bureaucrats.

 In the past, all the inspectors from young to veterans used to
investigate rationality and appropriateness of the banks’
categorization of the debtors based on the financial documents called
the “line sheets” submitted by each branches of the financial
institutions. Based on categorization as the normal debtors, debtors
to be watched, debtors in risks of bankruptcy, debtors substantially
in failure and debtors in failure, the financial losses of the banks
would be calculated and the amount of allowance would vary. In the TV
drama, the focus was whether the fictitious hotel would be categorized
into the “debtors substantially in failure”.

 Roughly speaking, the traditional way of supervising the industry was
that the Inspection Bureau notified the banks of the final results of
its inspections based on the spotted points submitted from the actual
site, and the Supervisory Bureau tried to reflect the result of the
inspections into its requests to the industry to improve management of
the financial institutions.

 Nonetheless, such the financial administration weighted on the
inspections has come to a turning point this time. Traditionally, the
FSA had released the annual basic guideline and basic plan of
inspections every year (July-June), and released its supervisory
policy simultaneously but separately.

・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・

⇒This continuance by PPPC Briefing Service

 PPPC’s weekly updates and articles are fully accessible to the
 subscribed customers.

This Week’s “Nagata-cho” (24.Sep-1.Oct, 2013)

 Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced on October 1 he will raise the
consumption tax rate from 5 to 8 percent on April 1 as scheduled. At
the same time, Abe unveiled a \5 trillion stimulus package to offset
some of the immediate negative effects of the tax hike.
 On September 30, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and New Komeito
agreed on the final draft of the outline of taxation reform for the
next fiscal year pillared on (1) a two-year extension of tax reduction
to the companies which raised wages, (2) requests to the business
world to raise wages, (3) ending special corporate tax surcharges for
reconstruction in disaster-hit Tohoku a year earlier than planned, (4)
tax deduction to the companies which invested to improve productivity,
and (5) revision (reduction) of vehicle-weight and vehicle-sales tax.

 The economic stimulus package includes a \10,000 cash allowance for
low earners and various tax cuts totaling about \1 trillion, including
temporary ones, as well as \730 billion in tax incentives to encourage
corporate investment. The total amount of tax reduction will amount to
about 1 trillion yen.

 In hammering out the stimulus package, Abe and the LDP proposed to
end special corporate tax surcharges for reconstruction in
disaster-hit Tohoku a year earlier than planned and thereby boost the
broader economy. This step would save firms a projected \900 billion
in total.
 Abe has been sensitive to requests from foreign investors, and has
repeatedly floated the idea of cutting the corporate tax to attract
more foreign business investment. But New Komeito, the LDP’s junior
coalition partner, opposes the idea. Unable to reach agreement, the
two parties merely agreed Monday to revisit the proposal by year’s
end.
 While Abe and his Cabinet has argued that a corporate tax cut would
help companies to raise wages, which would in turn benefit workers.
But Komeito doesn’t buy the notion and an arrangement will likely be
made some time after FY 2015.

 On September 30, the Abe Cabinet officially nominated the new 25 vice
ministers and 27 parliamentary secretaries while reappointing the
lawmakers engaging in the ongoing challenges like the post-quake
reconstruction and the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiation. Also,
Abe appointed 4 female lawmakers as vice ministers, increased from the
previous 1, putting into practice the mobilization of women’s power
which he has repeatedly appealed to the public.

 On September 25, the opposition Democratic Party of Japan, Your Party,
Communist Party, Social Democratic Party and People’s Life Party
jointly handed a document to Upper House President Yamasaki to request
the government to convene the Diet session earlier than October 15
officially scheduled in order to censure the government for its slow
response to the radioactive water leaks at the stricken Fukushima no.1
nuclear complex. The five opposition parties, according to the
Constitutional provision (Article 53), gathered signatures of 92 Upper
House lawmakers dominating more than a quarter of the House (242) to
enforce the Cabinet to convene a Diet session. Also, Jin Matsubara,
DPJ Chairman of Diet Affairs Committee, handed the same request to the
Chairmen of Diet Affairs Committee of LDP and Komeito. Yet, the
Cabinet will likely reject the request for Abe’s scheduled foreign
visits to attend meetings of APEC and ASEAN summits.

 Abe officially announced to raise the consumption tax from April 2014
in combination with the \5 trillion economic stimulus package on
Tuesday. It is to see how the opposition parties will respond to it
toward the convening of the next extraordinary Diet session on October 15.


9.27.2013

This Week’s “Nagata-cho” (17-24.Sep, 2013)

 Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Finance Minister and Deputy Prime
Minister Taro Aso had a meeting on September 18 to discuss the 5
trillion yen of economic stimulus to relieve potential negative
economic impacts of the consumption tax hike to 8% scheduled in April
2014. Abe seemed to have requested to entail a large corporate tax
reduction, while Aso, eyeing keeping balance of the country’s finance,
is in favor of compiling a supplementary budget to simply aid
low-income brochures and to add public works projects.
 Likewise, there are different views on the budget and economic policy
within the Abe Cabinet. While Abe, Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga and
the economic and fiscal policy minister Amari are rather positive on a
corporate tax reduction with an eye to accelerate the nascent economic
circulation, Aso, leading the Ministry of Finance, and many members of
the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s tax panel take the cautious
attitudes.

 Abe met Aso and Amari again on September 20 and agreed on the
framework of the 5 trillion yen of economic stimulus. It entailed (1)
expansion of corporate tax reduction and investment money to the
corporations which raised wages, (2) abolishment of the exceptional
corporate tax rate for reconstruction one year in advance of the
legislation, (3) maintaining the 35 trillion yen of reconstruction
fund until 2015, and to (4) entail measures in the economic stimulus
to make sure that the reduced tax would be reflected into wage
increases. While Aso suggested implementing the tax reduction from FY
2015, Abe didn’t accept the suggestion and postponed it to a next
meeting scheduled on September 30. Further, the economic stimulus will
likely entail other corporate tax reductions and deductions as well as
additional public works projects concerning the country’s roads,
tunnels, bridges, etc. Yet, there are persistent, cautious voices
toward the corporate tax reduction not only from the LDP itself but
its coalition partner New Komeito, so the LDP’s tax panel postponed
reaching a conclusion to its next meeting scheduled on September 27.


 Abe officially decided to reappoint all the LDP executive officers
whose terms are expiring this month and all the Cabinet ministers in a
meeting on September 17. Still, considering feelings of the party’s
young and middle-class lawmakers and their guardian faction leaders,
Abe will likely reshuffle the vice-ministers and parliamentary
secretaries on September 30.

 Abe Cabinet plans to submit bills to reform the civil service system
to realize a politically-initiated government in the next Diet session.
The bills include the ideas such as an establishment of Cabinet
Personnel Bureau to control nominations of about 600 high-class
officials, personnel evaluation and examination, training programs,
etc., or an increase of the advisory positions to Prime Minister from
the current 5 to 10. But since there are internal oppositions from
both the existing government ministries such as the National Personnel
Authority and LDP, underground negotiations and bargaining from
various grounds will likely continue for a little while.

・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・

9.26.2013

Reform Menu in National Strategic Special Zones

* Written by Eiji HARA, PPPC President

 The government is nearing the final stage of discussions on the
deregulatory reforms to be undertaken in the National Strategic
Special Zones toward the autumn Diet session. To submit a bill in the
next extraordinary session, the government needs to finalize the idea
within this week to start drafting the bill.
 In a meeting of the Industrial Competitiveness Council on September
20, Tatsuo Hatta, chairman of the Working Group on the National
Strategic Special Zones, and Heizo Takenaka, member of the Council,
proposed the following 15 items as challenges which must be tackled
immediately.

1.Urban Planning
・Relaxation of the floor-area-ratio restriction
・Improvement of are management
・Admission of using residential apartments for accommodations

2.Medical Care
・Acceptance of foreign doctors and nurses in medical centers
・Relaxation of the bed-number regulation
・Admission of using the drugs and medical devices accepted in foreign
  countries
・New medical schools tied-up with medical centers

3.Labor
・Exceptional measures to start-up companies and foreign companies
  regarding the dismissal rule, fixed-term employment rule, white
  collar exemptions.

4.Education
・Admission of public schools to be managed by private organizations

5.Agriculture
・Reallocation of authority among mayors and agricultural affairs
  committees
・Application of credit loans to small- and middle-sized corporations
  to farmers
・Reconsideration of conditions to be qualified as agricultural
  product corporations
・Admission of managing restaurants in farmlands

6.Local Assembly
・Lowering the minimum age to run for local assembly elections

7.Tourism
・Admission of using historical houses for accommodations

 It is critically important how much breakthroughs can be made toward
the “bedrock” regulations as start-up menu in starting the new
Special Zones. A member of the Industrial Competitiveness Council in
the meeting on September 20 insisted that “all the15 items should be
implemented”.
 How much result can be obtained? The answer depends on the efforts
within a few days.

9.25.2013

Outline of the paper submitted by Prof. Heizo Takenaka at the Industrial Competitiveness Council on September 20

National Strategic Special Zones should be “showcases for regulatory reform.”


Two types of Special Zones should be created for that purpose.
1.  “Global Business Cities,” which can attract excellent companies and human resources from all over the world,
2.  Models of local areas to grow autonomy, instead of depending on subsidies from the central government.


Shortlist of regulatory reform proposals (15 proposals) to be undertaken immediately


<Proposals for the Type 1>
1) Infrastructure / interchange of people
 - Transportation:  airports
 - City planning :  relaxing the floor-area-ratio restriction,  improving area management
 - Tourism:  allowing to use residential apartments for accommodations

2) Industries
 - Labor:  special rules for start-up companies and foreign companies
        (dismissal rule, fixed-term employment rule, white collar exemption)
 - Financial market

3) Living environment
 - Medical care:  removing the bed-number regulations,
             lifting the ban on establishing new medical schools,
             accepting foreign doctors,
             allowing the use of foreign-approved drugs and medical supplies
 - Schools:  allowing public schools to be operated by private organizations


<Proposals for the Type 2>
1) Infrastructure / interchange of people
 - Transportation:
 - Member:  lowering the minimum age to run for elections
 - Tourism: allowing to use historical buildings for accommodations

2) Industries
 - Agriculture:   allowing corporate ownership of farmland,
             removing regulations for bank loans,
             transferring the power of agricultural affairs committees to mayors,
             relaxing regulations on the use of farmland

3) Living environment
 - Medical care (remote diagnosis and treatment)
 - Schools (remote learning)