* Written by Yoichi TAKAHASHI, PPPC Chairman / Kaetsu University Professor
The economic and fiscal policy minister Akira
Amari said “we want to
make an environment in which companies
would be embarrassed if they
didn’t raise the wages even though their profits are rising.” To me,
it raised a question whether the central
government should pressure
private companies to raise wages in such
a straightforward manner.
Let’s look
at Amari’s statement from two perspectives;
political
and economic. First, from a political
point of view, Amari’s remark
scores almost perfect. All Amari said
was what the labor unions should
have voiced strongly. Needless to say, a
controller of the labor
unions is Rengo, the main supporter
group of the opposition Democratic
Party of Japan. Since Amari only said
what DPJ should have said on
behalf of Rengo from the ruling side, it
was like beating DPJ at its
own game as a political strategy.
From the beginning, although the monetary
policy is recognized as an
employment policy in the western
countries as it lessens unemployment
rates, the former DPJ government never
attempted to consider its
utilization to increase employments. So
it was obviously a political
defeat of DPJ when Prime Minister Shinzo
Abe started mentioning the
relaxing monetary policy as soon as
Liberal Democratic Party came back
to power. Perhaps, Rengo should have
supported Abe Cabinet from the
beginning as it cares about the
employment instead of DPJ which didn’
t do anything. Amari’s comment, touching a sore spot of DPJ and Rengo,
was a fitting one from a political
viewpoint.
However, Amari’s remark is a failure looking from an economic
perspective. The monetary policy is helpful
in terms of employment,
indeed, but its effect will usually be
visible only after two years or
so. As it was this April when the Bank
of Japan took the drastic
relaxing monetary policy, its policy
effects will be observable from
around April two years later. Meanwhile,
the Cabinet schedules to
raise the consumption tax rate from next
April, and its negative
impacts on the national economy will be
evident immediately. While the
Cabinet seeks to mitigate possible
negative impacts of the tax-hike by
a 5 trillion yen of economic stimulus
package, the amount of
government revenue expectedly increasing
from the next fiscal year by
the tax-hike is some 8 trillion yen;
further, the economic stimulus is
a temporary one for the fiscal year
while the tax-hike will last ever.
Therefore, the private companies cannot
help being cautious on raising
salaries of the employees because they
cannot be opportunistic about
the socioeconomic prospects.
To summarize, while effects of Abe’s ‘first arrow’ monetary policy
is yet to be seen, Abe’s ‘second arrow’ fiscal policy entailed just
5 trillion yen, amounting to only a half
of the 10 trillion yen of
supplementary budget compiled this
January and 5 trillion minus of the
last year’s economic package. Plus, the government officially
announced to impose more 8 trillion yen
by the tax-hike.
Many companies would probably like to request
the government to
suspend the tax-hike which will likely
bring unrests to the future of
society if the government demands them
to raise salaries in an
exchange.
A
few words for the minister Amari: please stop having an ‘easygoing’
idea that the situation could be handled
by a little bit of corporate
tax cuts despite that you are raising
the sales tax. It is more
embarrassing to raise the tax before the
country eradicates deflation
and the companies find it easy to raise
salaries of the employees
given visible positive effects of the “Abenomics.”
No comments:
Post a Comment